Nov 24 CFP Rankings: Top 25 Ranked Teams

Markets

• Ohio St.

  • Yes97%
  • No3%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Texas

  • Yes70%
  • No31%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Notre Dame

  • Yes97%
  • No3%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Oregon

  • Yes47%
  • No54%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Georgia

  • Yes97%
  • No4%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Indiana

  • Yes97%
  • No4%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Miami (FL)

  • Yes97%
  • No3%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Alabama

  • Yes94%
  • No7%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• LSU

  • Yes77%
  • No24%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Texas Tech

  • Yes91%
  • No10%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Texas A&M

  • Yes14%
  • No87%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Oklahoma

  • Yes23%
  • No78%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Ole Miss

  • Yes94%
  • No6%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Michigan

  • Yes25%
  • No76%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Tennessee

  • Yes90%
  • No11%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Penn St.

  • Yes4%
  • No97%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Florida

  • Yes57%
  • No43%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• USC

  • Yes69%
  • No32%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Clemson

  • Yes9%
  • No92%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• BYU

  • Yes95%
  • No5%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Missouri

  • Yes56%
  • No45%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Auburn

  • Yes34%
  • No67%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• South Carolina

  • Yes13%
  • No88%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• SMU

  • Yes40%
  • No61%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Iowa

  • Yes63%
  • No38%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Virginia

  • Yes8%
  • No93%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Washington

  • Yes7%
  • No94%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Louisville

  • Yes7%
  • No94%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Vanderbilt

  • Yes4%
  • No97%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Nebraska

  • Yes18%
  • No83%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Utah

  • Yes87%
  • No14%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Florida St.

  • Yes3%
  • No97%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Virginia Tech

  • Yes12%
  • No89%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Arizona

  • Yes38%
  • No63%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Houston

  • Yes82%
  • No19%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Pittsburgh

  • Yes5%
  • No96%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Baylor

  • Yes25%
  • No76%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Illinois

  • Yes7%
  • No94%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• North Carolina

  • Yes8%
  • No93%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Kentucky

  • Yes75%
  • No26%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Kansas St.

  • Yes12%
  • No89%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Wisconsin

  • Yes24%
  • No77%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• TCU

  • Yes12%
  • No89%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Arizona St.

  • Yes5%
  • No95%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Colorado

  • Yes4%
  • No97%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Cincinnati

  • Yes8%
  • No93%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Arkansas

  • Yes3%
  • No98%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Georgia Tech

  • Yes4%
  • No96%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Mississippi St.

  • Yes19%
  • No82%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Boise St.

  • Yes53%
  • No48%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Duke

  • Yes8%
  • No93%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Wake Forest

  • Yes84%
  • No17%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Oklahoma St.

  • Yes33%
  • No68%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Kansas

  • Yes5%
  • No96%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Tulane

  • Yes3%
  • No98%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• UCF

  • Yes5%
  • No95%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• San Diego St.

  • Yes3%
  • No98%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Northwestern

  • Yes27%
  • No74%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• Maryland

  • Yes3%
  • No98%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0

• California

  • Yes3%
  • No98%

  Volume $0 · Liquidity $0